Gum disease may quietly damage the brain, scientists warn-Click HereScientists reverse Alzheimer’s in mice with groundbreaking nanotech-Click HereIt sounds creepy, but these scientific breakthroughs could save lives-Click HereYour pumpkin might be hiding a toxic secret-Click HereA revolutionary DNA search engine is speeding up genetic discovery-Click HereWhy women live longer than men, explained by evolution-Click HereBananas could be ruining your smoothie’s health benefits-Click HereThis easy daily habit cuts heart risk by two thirds-Click HereWeight-loss drugs like Ozempic may also curb drug and alcohol addiction-Click HereLife expectancy gains have slowed sharply, study finds-Click HereSports concussions increase injury risk-Click HereUncovering a cellular process that leads to inflammation-Click HereNew study links contraceptive pills and depression-Click HereA short snout predisposes dogs to sleep apnea-Click HereBuilding a new vaccine arsenal to eradicate polio-Click HereThe Viking disease can be due to gene variants inherited from Neanderthals-Click HereQatar Omicron-wave study shows slow decline of natural immunity, rapid decline of vaccine immunity-Click HereMore than a quarter of people with asthma still over-using rescue inhalers, putting them at increased risk of severe attacks-Click hereProgress on early detection of Alzheimer’s disease-Click HereDried samples of saliva and fingertip blood are useful in monitoring responses to coronavirus vaccines-Click HereDietary fiber in the gut may help with skin allergies-Click HereResearchers discover mechanism linking mutations in the ‘dark matter’ of the genome to cancer-Click HereDespite dire warnings, monarch butterfly numbers are solid-Click HereImmunotherapy may get a boost-Click HereArtificial intelligence reveals a never-before described 3D structure in rotavirus spike protein-Click HereRecurring brain tumors shaped by genetic evolution and microenvironment-Click HereCompound shows promise for minimizing erratic movements in Parkinson’s patients-Click HereConsuming fruit and vegetables and exercising can make you happier-Click HereCOVID-19 slows birth rate in US, Europe-Click HereLink between ADHD and dementia across generations-Click HerePreventing the long-term effects of traumatic brain injury-Click HereStudy details robust T-cell response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines — a more durable source of protection-Click HereArtificial color-changing material that mimics chameleon skin can detect seafood freshness-Click HereNeural implant monitors multiple brain areas at once, provides new neuroscience insights-Click HereB cell activating factor possible key to hemophilia immune tolerance-Click HereMasks not enough to stop COVID-19’s spread without distancing, study finds-Click HereAI can detect COVID-19 in the lungs like a virtual physician, new study shows-Click HerePhase 1 human trials suggest breast cancer drug is safe, effective-Click HereRe-engineered enzyme could help reverse damage from spinal cord injury and stroke-Click HereWeight between young adulthood and midlife linked to early mortality-Click HereIncreased fertility for women with Neanderthal gene, study suggests-Click HereCoronavirus testing kits to be developed using RNA imaging technology-Click HereFacial expressions don’t tell the whole story of emotion-Click HereAcid reflux drug is a surprising candidate to curb preterm birth-Click HereTreating Gulf War Illness With FDA-Approved Antiviral Drugs-Click HereHeart patch could limit muscle damage in heart attack aftermath-Click HereA nap a day keeps high blood pressure at bay-Click HereIn small groups, people follow high-performing leaders-Click HereTick tock: Commitment readiness predicts relationship success-Click HereA comprehensive ‘parts list’ of the brain built from its components, the cells-Click HereResearchers confine mature cells to turn them into stem cells-Click HereNew tissue-imaging technology could enable real-time diagnostics, map cancer progression-Click HereEverything big data claims to know about you could be wrong-Click HerePsychedelic drugs promote neural plasticity in rats and flies-Click HereEducation linked to higher risk of short-sightedness-Click HereNew 3D printer can create complex biological tissues-Click HereThe creative brain is wired differently-Click HereWomen survive crises better than men-Click HerePrecise DNA editing made easy: New enzyme to rewrite the genome-Click HereFirst Time-Lapse Footage of Cell Activity During Limb RegenerationStudy Suggests Approach to Waking Patients After Surgery

Genetic Risk of Suicide Attempts – In-Depth Doctor’s Interview

0

Douglas Ruderfer, PhD, Associate Professor in Genetic Medicine, Biomedical Informatics and Psychiatry at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and JooEun Kang, MD, a PhD student at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, talk about how genetics play a role in suicide attempts.

Interviews conducted by Ivanhoe Broadcast News in December 2021.

What is it that you and your colleagues are looking at in your research?

RUDERFER: We’re studying the genetics of suicide. Suicide is the 10th leading cause of death in the United States; it’s top three among young adults and adolescents. The goal of studying the genetics is to inform the underlying biology that contributes to one factor of risk for suicidal behaviors, in particular the suicide attempt.

In your research, what exactly were your findings?

RUDERFER: Most individuals who have a suicide attempt have an underlying psychiatric condition. The work that we’re looking at is trying to ease apart the genetic risks for suicide attempts, specifically versus those that contribute to psychiatric disorders. What we found is that there actually is an independent genetic risk that is contributing directly to suicide attempt and is not simply through the risk for psychiatric disorders.

KANG: Our study is the largest study looking at the genetics of suicide attempt. It’s a global collaborative effort and it had over 250 investigators looking at the genetics of suicide attempt.

What are the genetic risk factors?

RUDERFER: In our work, we found two genomic regions that contribute specifically to suicide attempt. One of them appears to be mostly driven by psychiatric disorders, the other one appears to be mostly a strong risk factor for suicide attempt and has a stronger effect for suicide attempt than for psychiatric disease. Even after you condition out psychiatric disorders, this one remains significant. Unfortunately, we can’t learn much about this particular region, as there isn’t any informative biology that we can link those particular variants to currently.

With your findings, what implications can this have?

RUDERFER: The goal of studying the genetics of suicide attempt is to find some understanding of the biology that contributes to risk for these disorders, or in this case, this outcome. The hope would be to take that information and to use it as a pathway to understand ways in which we can both reduce risk or find strategies to intervene.

Besides the genetic risk, are there other types of risk factors for suicide attempts?

RUDERFER: There are many other nongenetic risk factors for suicide attempt. We didn’t study those directly, but one of the important findings that we had from the study is that an overlap of shared genetic risk between suicide attempt and other nonpsychiatric risk factors, such as sleep disorders or smoking or risk-taking behavior, is not mediated from that underlying risk for psychiatric disorders explicitly.

What surprised you most about the findings?

RUDERFER: The most surprising finding to me was just the sheer proportion of that risk that was directly contributable to suicide attempt, which is almost about half of what we found of that genetic risk is directly affecting suicide attempt as opposed to effecting suicide attempt through psychiatric conditions.

How did you go about collecting that data to analyze for this study?

RUDERFER: This was work by an international consortium. It included over 30,000 suicide attempt cases and 500,000 controls across a dozen international sites. So many individual sites from across the world came together to provide data to allow this study to be done at large scale, and it’s the largest study that’s been done by fivefold from previous work.

With the information that you found, what are some next steps that are happening after this?

RUDERFER: The next step would be to continue this effort looking for genetic variations that contribute to suicide attempt, to expand that to larger sample sizes to allow more power to identify more genetic regions that contribute, which we hope could provide more biological understanding as to what the genetic risk is telling us about the pathways to risk for suicide attempt.

KANG: The big next step for our study is looking at the broad spectrum of suicidal behaviors that are out there, and this includes even non-suicidal self-harm, suicidal ideation and suicide attempt and suicide death. There are all these different spectrums of suicidal behavior, and we still don’t know the genetics of those. We also don’t know whether it strictly goes through progression or not.

What impact can your research have on the average viewer’s life?

RUDERFER: A key aspect to this work is that although genetic risk contributes to these outcomes, like suicidal behaviors, it is not the only contributing factor; it is one of many controlling factors, and that genetics is not destiny. Importantly, there are lots of current strategies to reduce risk for suicidal behaviors that oftentimes starts with telling someone, like a friend, a family member, or a doctor, that you are struggling.

KANG: The big takeaway from our study is that it supports the multi-pronged approach when we think about suicide, especially when we think about prevention of suicide. By looking at the genetics of suicide attempt and how it relates to mental health disorders, but also nonpsychiatric traits, I think it supports the idea that there is no one risk factor that just defines suicide attempt.

What else do you feel that people should know?

RUDERFER: The most important aspect of this study is that we can identify genetic risk as a component of that overall risk for suicidal behaviors that is not at all complete and that is independent of psychiatric conditions, which often present with suicide attempt, but is biologically correlated with other nonpsychiatric risk factors, such as sleep disorders and risk-raking behaviors, that are important to consider in absolute terms of risk.

KANG: The main finding of our study was looking at the connection of depression and suicide attempt, and this was important because we know that depression is a major risk factor for suicide attempt, and we know this because the rates of suicide are higher in individuals who have depression versus people who don’t. So, we know that there is a link, but it was unknown how genetics contributes to each of this. It was unclear whether suicide attempt is simply a sequela of having a mental diagnosis, or we should think of these as two separate entities. What we found in our study was that the genetics of suicide attempt and major depressive disorder, while highly significant and correlated, they are parts of it that are not explained by depression. We found connections with nonpsychiatric risk factors, such as smoking and sleeping disorders, that are not completely explained by depression alone.

END OF INTERVIEW

This information is intended for additional research purposes only. It is not to be used as a prescription or advice from Ivanhoe Broadcast News, Inc. or any medical professional interviewed. Ivanhoe Broadcast News, Inc. assumes no responsibility for the depth or accuracy of physician statements. Procedures or medicines apply to different people and medical factors; always consult your physician on medical matters.

If you would like more information, please contact:

Craig Boerner

Craig.boerner@vumc.org

Sign up for a free weekly e-mail on Medical Breakthroughs called First to Know by clicking here